Library Hours Cuts Reignite Discussion Over Joining Sno-Isle Library System

At the end of 2024, the Everett Public Library announced a significant reduction in its operational hours due to budget constraints. The weekly hours were cut from 96 to 72, with both library branches now closed on Sundays and Mondays. This decision has sparked outrage within the community, particularly among the unhoused population, who rely on the library as a safe and warm daytime refuge—especially during the cold winter months.

The reduction in hours and ensuing "outrage" raises critical questions about whom the library is truly serving. If you visit the library as it is opening for the day, a long line of people shuffle in and settle into their favorite corner for a nap. While its facilities offer wonderful spaces for children and families, closing on Sundays disproportionately affects working families.

Last year, discussions about potentially annexing the Everett Public Library system into the Sno-Isle Libraries network sparked concern that the transition could limit essential services for underserved members of the community.

Perhaps it's time to explore converting one of the library buildings into a full-fledged community center. Such a move could open new funding sources from the state or county and ensure that operations include qualified social workers who can better address the needs of vulnerable populations. In a recent article in the Everett Post, Library Director Abigail Cooley highlighted the toll this situation has taken on staff, stating, "Library staff have been put into a position to act as a social service and more, but with fewer resources." She even states that her staff are experiencing burn out and trauma. It is evident that librarians, while dedicated to public service, should not be expected to serve as underequipped social workers.

During the annexation discussions, concerns arose about the potential financial impact on residents. Citizens questioned whether they would be willing to pay the 32 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value that other cities in Snohomish and Island counties contribute to support Sno-Isle Libraries. However, a key question remains: Did the Sno-Isle library system thoroughly evaluate how that levy might need to change to accommodate the change, or was it assumed that the rate would remain the same going forward? In theory, adding a large city like Everett to the system could lower the per-household cost by spreading expenses over a greater population.

Annexation was estimated to save the city of Everett approximately $6.8 million annually—nearly half of the budget gap projected for 2025. Sharing overhead expenses and subscription fees for electronic resources would create significant efficiencies. Given these potential benefits, why does the city maintain a separate library system? A deeper fiscal analysis is needed to understand how joining Sno-Isle could affect both Everett residents and the larger regional system.

Sno-Isle Libraries provide excellent services, a broad catalog of materials, and maintain daily service. As Everett residents grapple with these changes, it is worth revisiting the conversation about annexation—not just as a cost-saving measure, but as a way to ensure that our public library remains a vital resource for all members of the community.

What are your thoughts on whether the library needs to remain independent from the Sno-Isle network? Do you think the current allocation of resources is serving all residents in the best possible way? Share this article and start the conversation!